Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/speculation
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

greyseymour.eth pfp
greyseymour.eth
@greyseymour
Farcaster will have to implement some form of mass spam reduction functionality by EOQ, & the limits of permissionlessness will be tested.
3 replies
0 recast
30 reactions

freezer pfp
freezer
@freezer
3800 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

freezer pfp
freezer
@freezer
nice prediction, spam is definitely going to be an issue and is already on the rise. could be a plugin or third party service that handles spam for UI clients. the fc protocol moderating messages is a hot topic though, curious to see how it pans out.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

JR ↑ pfp
JR ↑
@juli
Warpcast will. Farcaster doesn’t need to imo.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction