Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
jtriley.eth
@jtriley
can we please rewrite erc4337 from the ground up? i dont wanna change the std it's just poorly organized and more monologue than specification
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
jtriley.eth
@jtriley
this is the bull case for devrel
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
