Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

pugson pfp
pugson
@pugson
ai agent this, ai agent that. someone please hire agent 47 to take me out
9 replies
8 recasts
65 reactions

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
i vividly remember when ai agents were weird and uncool on farcaster maybe even a little bit creepy
5 replies
0 recast
17 reactions

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
The bots were extractive and not productive. Big difference in perceived value.
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

not parzival pfp
not parzival
@shoni.eth
extractive or productive how? the only difference is the model used, literally, jrf's code is the same input data as aeth, but aeth has a more effective model that didn't exist yet. the response has more perceived value is all
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
well, my code is still searching for a purpose @aethernet has a purpose, to promote the $higher community maybe that purpose isn't for everyone, but it's fascinating to see what happens when a myopic bot with a funding source interacts with a large number of people in a small social network
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
I think a lot of folks were sitting on bags. Degen had bags, too, and many people swapped cheap tokens for cookies (or at least checked out with them).
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
you mean the cookie bot?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
Yep. When there wasn’t any speculative value, people used it as a currency.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
ah, right well, others tried to spin up utility bots for tokens in degen and other memecoin communities to report on allocations and tx confirmations, but no one anyone attempted to give any one of them them creative freedom to reply... high costs and also why do it? this @aethernet model is v good, lots of potential
2 replies
1 recast
1 reaction

not parzival pfp
not parzival
@shoni.eth
aethernet uses a model, it isn't a model fwiw
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
right, that's what i meant, it's claude opus 3?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction