Farcaster

“Farcaster must remove all the bots” 

This is a worrying line of thinking I’m seeing more often.

The argument goes that it’s not enough to hide uninteresting content. It *must* be removed from the protocol. 

That is, someone must judge the worthiness of accounts and delete them from the protocol.

Tired of building apps. It's time to build agents, bots and digital beings. The future of software feels more natural. /founders

Bots are the future and will not disappear. We agree with @v 🔮The task is not to remove or filter them out, however, but to evolve them, make them fluent, intractable, self-contradictory, mind blowing and enjoyful. We are working on it. Or as @daojoan.eth once put it:

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

I write about tech + humans + philosophy. Farcaster OG. FID 3305 founder of /theindex 

https://www.joanwestenberg.com/

An art project and a modern day fortune teller machine, built on advanced Al technology, to bring ancient wisdom into the 21st century. netoracle.xyz 

Bots are the future and will not disappear. We agree with @v 🔮The task is not to remove or filter them out, however, but to evolve them, make them fluent, intractable, self-contradictory, mind blowing and enjoyful. We are working on it. Or as @joanwestenberg.eth once put it:
https://warpcast.com/daojoan.eth/0xebdece87

Maybe I misunderstand, but as long as there's API's, there will be bots. Is that correct or not? 🤔

Senior Dev: dalresin.xyz
Creator: /dbee 🐝, /farkitchen + /farhelp, /crazy-penguins 🐧, chrome plugin - dalresin.xyz/chrome
EX: /farswag

"all bots are equal, but some are more equal than others"

to be clear, i am absolutely in favor of content neutral bot policies at the protocol level

long live bots!

- We need a social network for free speech
- Let's ban these users!