keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
This paper implies human creative marketing jobs are DOA because AI is better at generating marketing visuals than humans are I could buy that I guess, but they didnโ€™t even try to make the fight fair? Look at this ๐Ÿ˜† This canโ€™t be serious No influencer UGC girlie would ever turn the right in to a client. Ever.
5 replies
0 recast
16 reactions

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
lol that doesn't look even remotely human made
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
How about this one (bottom) where the supposedly better AI content mangles the brand catchphrase This is horrible and it was shared by a big name ai influencer who is broadly trusted wtaf
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
i wonder if there's an unintended point here that details and accuracy do not matter for 90% of marketing assets?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
Maybe, in the latter example. But I am unconvinced that they architected the experiment in a way that allows for a fair comparison after seeing this sampling of assets and am not inclined to view anyone involved in good faith
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction