Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jp 🎩
@jpfraneto.eth
since this cast 👇🏼 i have been asking myself and receiving input from others: how can this process be as fun and reliable and fair as possible? and today i came up with an idea that feels like that there are going to be 8 finalists and on thursday at 23:59 a 30 minute show will start through our frame where you will be able to see their pitches and vote for them based on the total amount of $hackathon you hold, you will be distributed “chips” or “points” which you will allocate to each one of the 8 finalists at the end of the 30 minutes, a script will sum the amount of chips that each one has and the winner will be the one with more wdyt? how would you do it? what would you change? now the challenge becomes to choose the 8 finalists from their: - github repo - production ready link
6 replies
3 recasts
16 reactions
Shomari
@shomari.eth
unless they're "staking" their $hackathon (maybe for 90 days), it would be easily gamed, simply based on the value of the reward there should be some "check" in place to prevent a bad actor(s) from abusing the voting system
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
jp 🎩
@jpfraneto.eth
but if we take a snapshot of the holders of $hackathon at 23:59 and their balances and use that as the source of truth on the backend and do this part backend only?
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions