Content pfp
Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/purple-publicgoods
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
if you have any Qs re: FarCon proposal, drop them here. if you object, please consider if any other potential proposal has generated as much energy or ROI as @farcon already has — the # of sponsors and participants is objectively unmatched. if you want specifics, remember this is a rapidly evolving event / startup.
14 replies
4 recasts
33 reactions

Joe Petrich 🟪 pfp
Joe Petrich 🟪
@jpetrich
Purple has a huge bias towards retroactive funding, or, save that, funding exact expenses over broad initiatives. I think you'd see almost no objections if you provided the invoices or estimates from vendors showing expenses>10eth and saying "it's for that." Now, I'm voting yes either way because eth is fungible.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
i agree and accept that. we will share vendor receipts. pls realize the $$ is less impactful after-the-fact unless we want to pay ourselves (not our #1 goal). tbh makes me sad that @purple, the DAO with a purpose to grow farcaster ecosystem, isn't one of the partners proactively looking to collab + work with us :(
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction