Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/nouns
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨
@joshuafisher.eth
The narrative is that Nouns was reckless but the reality is they weren’t nearly bold enough…I love funding small experiments and stuff but early on we were not funding enough aspirational projects that would attract the best in world…no clue how that changes now but hopes still high…regardless the power of ⌐◨-◨ is still as powerful today as it was pre-launch * ⌐◨-◨ means the art and power of the Noggles meme, which I don’t think most voters really understand sadly
2 replies
1 recast
9 reactions
mike good ⌐◨-◨
@mikegood
imo if all the projects funded delivered 110% of their vision, we'd be doing great... We cant make a 'bold statement' if the projects never get produced or paused for years. The narrative naturally turns to "reckless" .. ie: GlassesForKids was one of the props that drove many of us here- to find out its not complete this far down the line is something that contributes to people thinking this.. ya know? Beans, Fashion line, Comic books we've funded, the BBall Court .... the list goes on.. Imagine if all of this was all produced on time? It might be a different Nouns. But some of these projects were funded when nouns had 60M in the treasury and still not done... I could see Nouns going much more bold if we didn't already kinda blow our chances on previous big bets. ...Not to mention all the big bets we've place that are completely sunset now with no trace 🫠 fwiw I still believe in the power of ⌐◨-◨ ... and will continue to try to make bold statements for nouns with or without funding 🫡
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
JB Rubinovitz
@rubinovitz
Being against spending and “for” nothing is the path to a death spiral
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
