F A R T H E R ✨

What do you think of this idea?

https://frame.weponder.io/api/polls/5363

It's clear this is very unpopular so we won't move forward with it. Everyone can relax. 🧘‍♂️

I should have explained that preventing mercenary behavior is a central challenge for any crypto rewards system, but there are other options we can try which are less restrictive.

Building farther.social

Join us in /farther

Yeah, the idea is good but there are too many restrictions such as how we track history, the proper amount of tips, and such...

I'm already good with v2 but not with these restrictions 🙏

If we wanna spread farther, we should have more freedom to do so.

A degen, creator, and shitcaster born to be bullish.

you can't say "i gave up" without saying "i gay". so never give up. /artcoin simp. dunking farcaster mfers @ /4chain

There's already v2 for that. The thing is that you can't stop them but you have the power to limit their behavior. Decreasing their allowance is enough. 

We've seen this on Degen and there's no true answer for that. It all goes way to tipping should be fun. 

If you want your project to improve, you should listen to the majority, not with the minority ☺️

Wdym distribution problem when they already have 500k holders because of the distribution that they had. Continues change to their ecosystem fcked them up and that's the thing  farther should avoid. 

Imagine having 400 eligible tippers and your problem right now are farmers? 🤯 

You should focus more on how you will engage holders to tip engaging casts rather than limiting them to who to tip and who to not. 

There's no problem with the system right now, ask the community. It's on you 😉 I'm not being sarcastic too ☺️

what do you mean there is already v2 for that? for what exactly?

tipping should be fun, and that's why v2 tipping is now a gamified investment game.

how is "i tip you and you tip me back" fun?

$degen has a huge distribution problem because of farming, and why shouldn't we try something to reduce that even if it may not be the answer? shouldn't we at least give a solution a try and change it later if it doesn't work?

i'm not being sarcastic here, just really curious about your reasoning