The value of gamers actually owning their assets via web3 gaming is no where near understood by most gamers yet and thus no where near priced in yet.

Co-founder of ShapeShift, involved in DeFi, DAOs and self-custodial crypto ecosystem

? | via sequence. pimlico. poap. polygon. consensys. paxful. flipside crypto. dash. bridgewater associates. darpa. secdef. navy. dia | linktr.ee/alexanderchopan

Whatever I want - which is point the ownership :)

But seriously trade it, sell it, gift it, burn it - an entire world of possibilities when the economy of the assets is open and there is actual ownership.

what will u do if u own your stuff? not trolling just wanna hear more

Building /structs for the sentient

playstructs.com

I think the entire web3 gaming sector is heating up and will go through a massive repricing soon enough.

Many of the most valuable assets don’t even exist yet - parallels is showing a lot of what is possible now but this narrative is just getting started.

And of course hyped for @structs :D

Which assets do you feel are particularly undervalued from their potential in the on chain gaming realm?

While that will be a cool addition eventually I don’t agree. The benefit of just using blockchain rails to allow for an open economy for any games assets is in of itself a gigantic upgrade over traditional game economies (and needing to build all that infra themselves).

The problem is unless there is cross game compatibility financialisation is the main (only?) added benefit.