JA Westenberg on Warpcast

JA Westenberg pfp

@joanwestenberg.eth

I just deleted my book. A thread about choices, and doing the right thing. Because we're all facing a lot of that right now. 🧵

3 replies

4 recasts

16 reactions

JA Westenberg pfp

@joanwestenberg.eth

During COVID, I started working on a book called Permissionless. It was born out of frustration—the kind that gnaws at you when you see how broken the systems are, how unnecessary the gatekeepers have become, how much red tape gets in the way of solving real problems.

1 reply

1 recast

7 reactions

JA Westenberg pfp

@joanwestenberg.eth

The book was about taking the DIY ethos and applying it as a manifesto for problem-solving, social change, cutting through bureaucracy, pushing past institutional overreach. A manifesto for people who saw the world as something they could rebuild, rather than something they had to accept.

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

JA Westenberg pfp

@joanwestenberg.eth

I self-published it this year. I was happy with the launch. It found its audience. People bought it, shared it, sent me messages saying it resonated. Recently, a publisher reached out. They wanted to release the book. Expand its reach. Give it legitimacy. So I sat down to read it again...

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

JA Westenberg pfp

@joanwestenberg.eth

And I realized I had to say no. Not just say no—I had to delete the whole thing from my website. Remove it from Gumroad. Kill it completely. No matter how much money I was leaving on the table. No matter how many copies had already been sold. Because the world had shifted under my feet.

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

JA Westenberg pfp

@joanwestenberg.eth

Elon Musk and his acolytes—his billionaire cronies, his reactionary fanboys, the cult that believes burning everything down is the same thing as building something better—have twisted ideas like mine into weapons.

1 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

JA Westenberg pfp

@joanwestenberg.eth

They’ve taken concepts like regulatory bloat and institutional decay and rent-seeking and duplicitously turned them into blunt objects they’re currently using to destroy the world I love.

1 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

JA Westenberg pfp

@joanwestenberg.eth

They don’t believe in permissionless the way folks like me meant it. They don’t want to create. They want to destroy. They want to gut expertise, dismantle institutions, break things just to watch them shatter, then call it innovation. And I refuse to be useful to them in any way, shape or form.

1 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

JA Westenberg pfp

@joanwestenberg.eth

There’s a version of Permissionless that exists in a better world—a world where breaking down barriers is about lifting people up, not tearing them down. A world where expertise isn’t the enemy, where knowledge isn’t discarded in favor of whoever yells the loudest.

1 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

JA Westenberg pfp

@joanwestenberg.eth

But that’s not the world we live in. And I can’t pretend otherwise. I believe in the ideas in my book. But I also believe in responsibility. I believe in knowing when something you create could do harm in the wrong hands. I believe in looking at a movement and asking, Who benefits? Who suffers?

2 replies

0 recast

5 reactions

JA Westenberg pfp

@joanwestenberg.eth

And if the answer makes my stomach turn, I don’t get to look away. I wrote Permissionless because I wanted to see a world where people took action instead of waiting for permission. But I won’t let my work become an excuse for dismantling what little stability we have left. So the book is gone.

1 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

thoughtcrimeboss pfp

thoughtcrimeboss

@thoughtcrimeboss

I appreciate your reasoning, but I don't understand why you should delete it if you believe in the ideas in it. Lots of good things can also be used for evil, but at the same time they can also be used for good. The ten commandments are good ideas but they have also been used for evil, that doesn't mean they should just be deleted. Maybe you manage to prevent some harm by deleting your ideas but you may also prevent many positive things as well, there is no way to know. Also it's not on you, it is not your responsibility if someone twists your ideas and uses them for evil. I believe good ideas should be shared no matter what, even bad ideas should be shared so they can be picked apart and allow people to understand why they are bad ideas which may actually prevent evil rather than enabling it. I wish I could of read your book before you deleted it, but I respect your choice even though I disagree with it.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction