Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/believein
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jihad ↑
@jihad
I’ve been thinking a *lot* about /believein. This was originally supposed to be a Higher-aligned grants program for non-crypto writers. It later evolved into a research and discussion group for indies, still repping Higher. For one reason or another, neither of these routes made sense for *me.* My work has evolved a ton since launch, and it was clear that I couldn’t just pigeonhole whatever I was doing into “Higher-alignment.”
6 replies
1 recast
20 reactions
jihad ↑
@jihad
I’ve always been interested in Craig Mod’s idea of a personal membership for “unlocking the commons.” In other words: the point of the membership is to support the work of an individual *across the nerwork* — perks are secondary. I think /believein is best suited in that light. I have been and will continue to be doing work across the network: Farcaster, Higher, onchain more broadly. This is a way for folks to support me. It’s also a way for me to make this membership more palatable to a “non-crypto” audience who might not care about Higher or want to be on Warpcast (trust me, giving away free money wasn’t enough for some folks).
2 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
jihad ↑
@jihad
So TL;DR: - Believe in Something is now a personal membership program to support my writing and work across the network. You’re subscribing to support me, Jihad, and my work. - I’ll only be selling annual subscriptions. - I’m saving a lot of money by doing this onchain. 10% of all revenue will be used to market buy $HIGHER every month. - If you’re a current subscriber and not vibing with this direction, DC me and I’ll get you a refund. - Members will get a monthly private newsletter and access to a one-way Telegram chat/journal + first dibs on a lot of projects and work I do. Everything else is open to the commons, thanks to you. Higher.
1 reply
0 recast
14 reactions
Anaroth
@anaroth
Perhaps a Jihad flows grant would be more in alignment?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction