Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jihad ↑ pfp
jihad ↑
@jihad
The longer people can’t cleanly categorize Higher, the better.
2 replies
2 recasts
34 reactions

Zach Davidson pfp
Zach Davidson
@zd
How do you grapple with the ideas that the clearer something is, the easier it is to understand, and the less clear something is, the harder it is to understand? Would you argue that this frame is false, and the opposite is true?
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

jihad ↑ pfp
jihad ↑
@jihad
Ironically enough, I’m a big proponent that capital flows to the most legible ideas. Our goal should be to make Higher legible through specific initiatives. The network itself — and the brand broadly — doesn’t need to be. Ethereum is similar :)
2 replies
1 recast
6 reactions

Zach Davidson pfp
Zach Davidson
@zd
I really love the comparison to Ethereum. It's basically everything and nothing at once, and that tension is what forces the creativity from builders. Fwiw, I like the fact that Higher is legible to different people in different ways, and I think your response reflects that tension quite well :)
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

madlog↑c pfp
madlog↑c
@madlog1c.eth
read your first cast and came to reply with comparison to eth (it is similar in many multiple ways), you already beat me to it
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions