Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
July
@july
For the foreseeable future, I think that LLMs will continue to: - improve significantly on what can be measured - struggle on what cannot be measured
10 replies
0 recast
63 reactions
July
@july
In many ways, I think the limit is what can be measured. In order to do better on what cannot be measured, we will need to convert more of what cannot be measured to what can be measured, and I think we continue to vastly underestimate what cannot be measured because it is an unknown unknown (we have no idea)
4 replies
0 recast
20 reactions
John Hoang
@jhoang
Second this. AI takes over the known knowns space, pushing humans more into the unknown unknowns.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
daivd 🎩👽 ↑
@qt
I agree fundamentally, but I also think AI helps highlight unknown known knowns. AI helps find and fill in the details of the overall knowledge gaps. AI connecting dots that exist. Humans finding new dots.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
John Hoang
@jhoang
Definitely possible, but the real value is described by the nine dot puzzle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine_dots_puzzle
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
daivd 🎩👽 ↑
@qt
I think that should be an "and", and I agree with you. Back to July's premise, AI will help highlight what we think can't be measured but actually can be. And in doing so will implicitly highlight the immeasurable, or yet-to-be-measurable, enabling humans to focus on the unknowns and making them measurable I think we're saying similar things here, and agreeing. I'm typing it all out to make sure I understand myself, not to be disagreeable
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
