Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/clanker
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

alex pfp
alex
@proxystudio.eth
jesse: if Yon launched gdupi today as a ‘content coin’ on Zora, would it be considered a success? would it validate your thesis about content coins + zora? yon has earned (going by today’s prices) >$25,000 from $GDUPI rewards total creator rewards on (post-coin) zora are ~$460,000 Yon has individually earned ~5.5% of creator rewards earned by ~all~ zora coin creators. he is incredible btw, as you know and we’ve discussed. he earned these rewards because of his own exceptional efforts, talent, with some minor help on our side with distribution. just trying to understand: what about Yon’s experience leads you to believe that many more coins = a better model for artists? he basically did the opposite of some of the content coin stuff you’ve describe. Yon very much stepped up to seize the opportunity / obligation of creating cool work around the coin. and what about it tells you zora is the platform to help them do so vs. clanker? slightly confused as to the reference there.
13 replies
10 recasts
92 reactions

jesse.base.eth 🔵 pfp
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
no! that's the opposite of what I'm saying. putting aside where $gdupi is launched, I think it's good/viable to have a long running creator coin! what I'm trying to tease out is how do you reliably close the attention -> demand loop. I think there's potentially a path to doing that with creating content where you use that infinite game of content to drive value back to the long running creator coin. two ways I could imagine this working: 1. create content in the form of open edition NFTs, have it be mintable with $gdupi. this creates demand for gdupi, but unclear if there's sustainable demand for pure patronage at scale in this model 2. create content in the form of erc20s, pair it with $gdupi (a la what mint.club has been experimenting with). this also creates demand and I currently have a thesis could be more long term sustainable. my north star is how do we enable creators to create content as an infinite game, while letting the attention they capture drive value back to them. does that make sense?
6 replies
0 recast
14 reactions

jesse.base.eth 🔵 pfp
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
I think I've said this to you but I actually think that more projects should clank for their long term projects then experiment with tools like zora (or rodeo or others) for content creation. I also think it would be really cool if you/someone built something that tried to solve this content->attention->demand feedback loop on top of clanker v4. we need way more shots on goal on this!
0 reply
0 recast
10 reactions

alex pfp
alex
@proxystudio.eth
“my north star is how do we enable creators to create content as an infinite game, while letting the attention they capture drive value back to them.” this makes a ton of sense to me, its what I do every single day and what I guide creators to doing with clanker. we often talk about how with a creator roll they “get attention & earn” what is that if not the content creation game?
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

Callum Wanderloots ✨ pfp
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
Yeah this has been my plan for a long time but I don’t feel there is a solid framework to make it happen, kind of what I was mentioning before with needing splits and control of funds to flow from the fleeting attention to the permanent creator coins We need more nuance than a “post” token
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

gFam.live (UrbanGladiator) pfp
gFam.live (UrbanGladiator)
@gfam
60000 $HUNT
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

EIP.Tools pfp
EIP.Tools
@eiptools
Explore the EIPs / ERCs mentioned in this cast:
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

kaina🐱 pfp
kaina🐱
@kaina
9919 $hunt
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction