jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
I love this idea
9 replies
0 recast
33 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Honest question - what's the benefit of an "L3" here? If the event span is shorter than the time it takes to play exit games, then why not just have a server and post selective data to L2 at the end of the event?
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
L3s don't have to be optimistic w/exit games. could do validity proofs. or could even just do a trusted commitment at the end from the operator. benefit is: 0. use L2 assets 1. write everything in EVM 2. integrate seamlessly with other EVM tools 3. everything is open and onchain it's gradually going to "just work"
3 replies
1 recast
11 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
> could even just do a trusted commitment at the end from the operator I get what you're saying. It's easier to use the same tool-suite if the shape of the backend is a "chain"
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
silv
@silv.eth
I thought another huge benefit of L3 was that gas fees can be drastically cheaper than L2? So many more txns can be on-chain than were feasible otherwise? Or is that not the case
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Gum🎩🖼️
@gum
For retards like myself I'll break it down: - Its essentially ideal for games (think subnets like avax) - Using assets like $OP and other L2 tokens are possible - Still open (not as decentralized but i dont think anyone cares) - More sequencer fees for Base/OP which benefits Base L2
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
