Content
@
0 reply
26 recasts
27 reactions
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
i expect that 90% of builders should start on L2, then migrate to an L3 if they achieve enough scale that they need "dedicated blockspace". the one exception to this is games that are doing *everything* onchain from the beginning - there, it may make sense to start with L3s. L2 = AWS EC2 L3 = your own data center
8 replies
17 recasts
70 reactions
Apex777 🦖
@apex777
Any examples of who you think should go to an L3 that is already on L2 Base, other than games?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
TOM
@subtlegradient
Skipping directly to L5 offline first local edge device first synchronized via zero knowledge open whisper gossip protocol networks
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jordan 🎭
@momcas1
😍
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jacob
@jtdev
Every time I see a cast about L3s, I buy more Celestia
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ethspresso 🚌🔵🎩
@ethspresso.eth
I like this way of structuring it. Also good to see someone call out that cloud (AWS) is not the final layer in regular datacenter operations.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
eni
@eni
what do you think about the future of gas golfing stuff? My hot take would be that they'll eventually become irrelevant
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
pgpg
@pgpg.eth
Why do you want people that need their own block space to build L3s?!?! Fuckin disaster of an architecture. We need to get rid of the layers and build aggregated systems.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Boffin // MBA, NGMI, ILY🎩
@ninjaboffin
Everything onchain while it sounds nice, is more often than not needed entirely, especially if its a consumer type of app (like games). Cool for certain users, but for mass adoption, its tricky
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
