Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Jesse Walden
@jesse
Frames as the “why now” for micropayments: See the content in the feed, tap to expand/read actually mints the media for $0.03, the NFT issued is the paywall cookie. Works for AIs too. This is why all internet media gets incepted as NFTs.
8 replies
9 recasts
101 reactions
eric.base.eth 🔵
@ericbrown.eth
All internet media as NFTs does seem to be inevitable Creators want to sustainably monetize which micro payments enable. And to get paid if AI is training on their content (potentially paying more than humans) Per your cookies note, the NFTs also create data about user preferences acting as self selection cookies
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
Capitulation
@capitulation
Is the transfer to long form content just to have it “frame mint gated” or are there more interesting mechanics already out there?
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Browsers are set to get rid of third party cookies. My hypothesis is money in advertising is going to shift over to influencer marketing. I can see a world where influencers say “first 500 people to mint this vid get X”. I’m working on zkTLS, and apparently fandango data is very valuable to media companies.
0 reply
1 recast
7 reactions
shawn
@shawn
@serjkorj deplan’s time to shine
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ben
@ben-el-baz
NFT paywall cookies enabling the final stage in Web3 composability
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Crypto Channel
@anhchangvuitinh
Plz follow me again
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Topher
@centari
Seems like the right primitive, but may require change in the norms or cheaper tech? Back of the envelope conservative content reads: 50/day or 1500/mo. @.03 = $45/sub $10/mo. @ .03 = <12 reads/day Both seem unlikely; however, 50/day @.007 fetches a typical $10/mo. sub Perhaps batching reads lowers the cost?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BowTiedTed
@bowtiedted
How do you feel about this being a potential phishing vector? Brand new here but that was my first thought
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
