Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/sop
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ȷď𝐛𝐛
@jenna
open means open, can't have open + safe
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Timber ☀️
@timber
I think you can have small open+safes, just not big open+safes
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ȷď𝐛𝐛
@jenna
wolves can join at any size need for gatekeeping never goes away if you want safe
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Timber ☀️
@timber
true, I concede - the minimum level of gatekeeping is definitely above 0. I think it scales exponentially relative to size. Small can be much more open than big. Fewer places for a wolf to hide, closer proximity of gatekeepers to center of operations
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ȷď𝐛𝐛
@jenna
yeah def a case where size matters and yet even small family systems often suffer from wolves* who can act against wolves ie power relations figures into it all *ps not comfortable that I've introduced this namecalling here. real wolves are not a problem in natural systems (when in balance ofc etc etc etc)!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction