Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrangodamus - bank/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
Hey everyone, say hello to @jeffreykoury! A phd in neuroimmunology, and he also leads the @researchhubf foundation. Give him a warm FC welcome
2 replies
0 recast
17 reactions
Jeffrey Koury
@jeffreykoury
Pleasure to be here. Highest signal to noise connections I’ve made in quite some time on FC! Also follow @rgoldoni at RH Foundation, and @joycesticks co-founder of ResearchHub. Lots of infrastructural issues in science we hope to improve. Fixing system of science —> step-wise improvement in science.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
EulerLagrangodamus - bank/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
Can you expand on this. I only did undergrad in math and physics, and carry a deep curiosity about the natural world. Ultimately decided academic research wasn’t for me. @aviationdoctor.eth is probably more familiar with how academic science actually works. Would be curious to hear your spiel on what’s wrong.
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Jeffrey Koury
@jeffreykoury
Absolutely, TL;DR The science stack is comprised of 1) funding 2) experimentation 3) publication/peer review and 4) science communication 1) Funding turnaround speeds are ~1 year from starting a grant to receiving funds 2) No great 21st century coordination/collab tools to streamline collaboration
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Jeffrey Koury
@jeffreykoury
3) Oligopoly of publishers/journals that rent extract (up to $12K for them to host a PDF) WITHOUT paying peer reviewers 4) Science isn’t communicated in digestible ways to lay audiences. Therapies + global health issues impact everyone, so we should not expect them to read a 26 page deeply scientific manuscript!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
