jdjdc
@jdjdc
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
25 replies
58 recasts
384 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
just “tokens” — it’s cleaner
as in “non-fungible tokens” & “fungible tokens” as was originally intended
it’s not a branding problem, it’s a greed problem; it’s a “how can we survive if we don’t lean in dogshit” problem; a “everyone else is doing it” problem; a “we’re just having fun” problem
well we can’t have our cake & eat it too & we can’t take back what’s already done
if we do our jobs right, “base tokens” should be synonymous with value, utility, builders, revenue, etc. etc.
we shouldn’t have to rebrand
we’re only rebranding now because we peddled dogshit behind the memecoin veil & it blew up in our face
we liked that 3 months ago; we called bitcoin a memecoin
tokens have purposes: we have yield tokens, revenue tokens, tipping tokens, governance tokens, gaming tokens, etc.
we have tokens that do things & thus need specification when addressing them individually
we don’t need to rebrand (again)
we need to stop peddling dogshit 2 replies
3 recasts
22 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
2 recasts
9 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
8 replies
2 recasts
28 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
9 replies
5 recasts
29 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
3 replies
8 recasts
57 reactions
23 replies
25 recasts
297 reactions
13 replies
1 recast
31 reactions
1 reply
2 recasts
33 reactions
8 replies
7 recasts
55 reactions
