Not sure I agree with the results thus far. I feel the earlier limited sample size was on target logically but the crowd isn't considering power dynamics and infighting

Not sure I agree with the results thus far. I feel the earlier limited sample size was on target logically but the crowd isn't considering power dynamics and infighting https://www.weponder.io/surveys/1487

Thank you Jayce for keeping @cameron price in check. The very fact that he's in the survey is why I will take the 7x opportunity on him ANY DAY. 🫡🫡🫡

/cameron for content experiments. Helping Creators with /seemore. Yapping on /okbanger. Curating in /lounge. Dev + Veteran + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

Product at Popular Science and Futurism. 
Have literal skin in the game on /nonanon

building /bracket | hosting /greatbooks + /gray | ex-BCG, ex-PHD | poli + phil + econ

Personally I was surprised to see this move. I feel the crowd was off on this one in the survey. That said, the prices are correcting to what I feel is a reasonable level of uncertainty. @cameron is a strong player and connector, if he made any foes behind the scenes, I haven't see it.

Pi-chi.eth (she/her) Artist /animeoutcasts
Purple Promoter|Tokyo DAO
Hosting: /moxietools /kyoto /sakura  /anime-manga /tokyotravel

https://www.fan.io/pichi

I can’t confirm or deny anything…
But the blind items suggest some points to look out for:

- players that are the most detached (..disinterested, or?)
-  we look at “weak-links” but eliminations won’t be bottom up, might the strongest players be at risk?
- double agents?

Think about the people still in play

Got any tea on the infighting so we can adjust our bets?