noundry

a new wave of defeatist signalling from some nouners coming out of the latest noundry proposals.

annoying to see lame signals sent to artists, I hope artists don't get too discouraged from it.

Does the noundry team have the capacity and ideas to remove the need for trait upgradable for 3rd party products?

curiosity maxi.

co-founder of @nounish and @nounsfest.  creator of gifs.

Nouns Governance. It ain’t easy but it’s rewarding if you pass. And also a great learning if you get defeated.

What’s the lesson you think proposers are able to learn in this context?

add the compensation.  Would dare say that action alone push the prop that sparked your msg across the line

It’s probably a good thing it’s catching the same reason as its time proximity. At least people are consistent and have that opinion. Hopefully, this conversation can help educate or smooth trait addition and the backend work required to make it more just subject to art, and payment.

Ok I think I follow, yeh I think that’s clear and fine feedback and a thing to learn.

but prop 587 is catching almost all the same against votes (with comp signal included) for not playing by the brand new rules made up suddenly. Which is what I’m calling out as unproductive above.