The irony is proof of human is way less valuable in web3 vs. web2.

In web2, you monetize via ads. At least right now, AIs (i.e. bots) aren't influenced by ads.

In web3, you monetize via transactions. AIs can do transactions. And as a developer, if you're monetizing via transactions, in most cases you don't care if the transaction is from a human or from an AI. You just care that it happened.

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

one consistent thing I heard this past week: proof of human is critical if you want to drop a network token to incentivize network growth and *quality* engagement and contributions

@usv | jared.xyz | formerly founder of groupme and fundera 

Plenty of humans that don’t post / engage in a quality way?

In our experience building for crypto teams, most of them don't necessarily care if bots inflate their activty, as they can raise at higher valuations, VCs don't care either (if the hype is big enough to lure retail and) if they can exit quick enough.