timdaub
@timdaub.eth
Public goods are defined through their lack of two distinct types of externalities - rivalry - excludability They are NOT defined by exclusion of other externalities e.g. - being beneficial to society - being more morally good than morally bad - being inclusive and/or universally accessible
2 replies
2 recasts
1 reaction
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
Is inclusive == non-exclusive?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
jamesyoung.eth
@jamesyoung
if you think love == non-hate
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
Agreed. Also see picture. Also: The inverse of fragile isn‘t robust, it‘s anti-fragile. Taleb nicely motivated that.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction