Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

James McComish pfp
James McComish
@jamesmccomish.eth
Played around with session keys for the @base smart wallet over the weekend. Recommend checking out the docs in the smart-wallet-persmissions repo which does a good job at explaining each part of the setup. Seems to have a similar outcome to the modular accounts of 7579, and also have concepts like separate validation/execution stages that are compatible with 4337. Need to get a working 7579 example first to compare, but at first glance the new smart sessions from rhinestone/biconomy are a more complete solution - but the current smart-wallet-permissions is a v1 so is likely to change. https://github.com/jamesmccomish/session-testing https://github.com/coinbase/smart-wallet-permissions/tree/main/docs
3 replies
1 recast
9 reactions

xh3b4sd โ†‘ pfp
xh3b4sd โ†‘
@xh3b4sd.eth
Right now I have account abstraction working in plain 4337 style using Privy and Biconomy. Why should I care about smart wallets? It feels like there is a lot of movement across many different approaches. Do we as an industry at some point agree on one standard? And what should the builders use right now?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Harpalsinh Jadeja pfp
Harpalsinh Jadeja
@harpaljadeja
If you faced trouble with persisting session keys here's an article I wrote https://www.harpaljadeja.com/articles/persisting-cbsw-session-keys-in-indexed-db
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Matthew Fox ๐ŸŒ pfp
Matthew Fox ๐ŸŒ
@matthewfox
Yeah session keys aren't new but are wildly powerful UX devices
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction