I just launched two versions of the same coin at the same time.

They are both called “Zora vs. Clanker”.

I deployed one via clanker and posted the other on zora.

Zora: 0x35d5e3a844be7de848be284729ec3bee344ea76d
Clanker: 0x32d9Ab10F7651c3999AF3163e2f24bF1Ec3a5eEf

May the best launcher win.

Zora vs. Clanker stats update #1:

Zora: $14K mcap, $77k vol, 2,576 holders, up 329% (24h)
Clanker: $49K mcap, $100k vol, 232 holders, up 37% (24h)

The Zora version has more holders and price appreciation. The Clanker version has a higher market cap and volume. So far.

what sort of fees (e.g. creator rewards, trading fees from LP'ing etc...) are you seeing?

Building @tipn /rebase | Advising /24art | Prev. @cent Nifty Gateway | Hosting /thewipmeetup | byteGAN #265 PFP by @vanarman

Roughly $600 across both evenly split including about half that in ETH the other half in the respective coins and I used that to fund the dexscreener info / coin pfp updates so net breakeven, roughly

no just clanker and zora default launches

thanks for the info. adding equal amounts of liquidity to both pools would be the last vector to compare performance (based on volume would assume you would have earned more trading fees from the clanker but super interesting nonetheless