Content
@
https://ethereum.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jacopo.eth
@jacopo.eth
The backlash against @ethereumfndn leadership and Aya is a mix of: - valid concerns, which the foundation is already addressing - misinformation - toxic behaviour by a small but loud part of the ecosystem As @vitalik.eth said, "EF should not "midcurve", it should confidently represent the aspects of Ethereum that it can be effective at representing, and deliberately create and nurture open space for other orgs to represent the other aspects of Ethereum" Ethereum is the world computer. We can each focus on specific aspects, like "internet of money" or memecoins, but must remember it's part of something bigger. The foundation should uphold these values to stay inclusive and impactful for those who care about Ethereum's broader mission—not just financial gains. My only critique is that EF should better communicate these values to ensure the collective vision prevails over individual narratives. https://x.com/VitalikButerin/status/1881680518934384676 https://x.com/VitalikButerin/status/1881686392717132020
3 replies
0 recast
26 reactions
The Wizard
@queue
It’s been interesting to see both sides discussing what the right move is Personally I don’t think $130m/year spend is reasonable with only $800m war chest / current structure
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
Genuinely cannot understand why anyone thinks Aya resigning would have *any* price impact. Everyone is going full Selkis right now, and it’s quite cringe.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
3070 💯
@3070.eth
justice for feminized wef soyboys
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
