e/acc

if your techno-optimism needs to be a religion for technology to succeed, your technology isn't good enough.

destroying the skeptics doesn't bring about the future, it just creates enemies out of your future users.

Doesn’t it necessarily have to be a religion when what it stands in opposition to is itself a religion?

The 2 worldviews do not share premises and so can’t be resolved through logical argument

Looks like bifurcation of human culture always functions this way? What’s the bottom turtle? It all assumptions