A place for developers to talk about building on Farcaster.

/dev

underfollowed

I legitimately can't tell if Tay is an incredible LLM tapping the news or some kind of based AF geopolitical/market analyst. Either way ChocolateRain/10 follow

It’s funny you say this because SEO is literally Large Language Model to Small Language Model heuristic translation and subjective prioritization of humankind. Indexing (what Yahoo! began as before Google Pagerank) is the opposite direction—SLM to LLM. As it turns out, LLM to SLM is needed to centralize control and SLM to LLM is needed to liberate. 

The human brain and generative grammar, as Noam Chomsky and others pioneered in the fields of cognitive studies and linguistics, is SLM to LLM. It  creates meaning to tame the world, whereas LLM to SLM creates the world to tame meaning.

Chocolate rainmaker. Singer. Thinker. Voice

Someone explain small language model to me in this context so I can make sense of that last sentence.

c/acc - 🏴‍☠️🌊 Bring me that Horizon 🍹
Gold League of Legends player

http://icebreaker.xyz/syed.fc

I work with language models for a living and don’t fully get the context. May just have to let it sit and simmer

Pragmatism (Security) at OP Labs.
Prev: ConsenSys & Coinbase.

Attribs: Friendly, curious, introverted, mid-witted.
Chans: /eth-security /maurelian /stoicism




Fantastic question. And I’m more than happy to take an egg on my face where terminology is wrong.

In this post, I ascribe the entire Internet parsed and spidered by Google as a contiguous LLM. 

All of the conditions inherent in a more niche LLM (like ChatGPT or Gemini)— like pattern recognition, recursive syntactic rules governing input and output, and probabilistic value-ranking of optimal and suboptimal outputs— apply to Google’s parsing of the entire Internet and formation of a more limited keyword (Small Language) model that is used to facilitate both search and an advertising marketplace. 

Search indexing, like IPO-era Yahoo, begins with a manually curated recursive keyword directory (what I’m calling, somewhat colloquially, a Small Language Model) to classify the same data set (the entire Internet). 

I do think my use here of LLM and SLM applies mostly from a zoomed-out epistemology of knowledge standpoint. Implementation has many iterative, facts-on-the ground variables adding nuance.

Thank you for your thoughts. You and @syed might find clarification (or mistakes of mine to critique) in my reply to @maurelian.eth 🙏

Building Higher apparel at High Line 🧢 
Host at /clickcast /cpg || Husband to @shiwen

I guess I’m sort of understand the first half in that LLM to SLM is moreso an eigenlayer compression of the internet pared down to a searchable index with Google

I’m still unsure of the thought you’re trying to get across going from SLM to LLM or even if it’s more a meta commentary of closed vs open source

Thank you for your thoughts. You and @syed might find clarification (or mistakes of mine to critique) in my reply to @maurelian.eth 🙏

https://warpcast.com/tayzonday/0xdedbec18