basil (recession arc) pfp
basil (recession arc)
@itsbasil
ok, zora… now we’re talking; we’re still not playing the same game but at least we’re having a conversation it appears “just for fun” was all but a legal shield i have been very vocal about points one & two here as i believe they’re the first two steps needed to ignite the flywheel i’ve also talked about points 3 & 4 in the past & think they’re good steps forward “but basil, these mechs have been tried & failed” >so has just about everything else we’re doing here it will come down to luck, timing & splits “but basil, liquidity” >it never existed in the first place imo this out-positions zora relative to competition; it will now come down to incentives re creators, collectors & net-new users if they can tune that properly they should have a good shot at sustainable network effects (again; only if they can incentivize correctly) overall these are good updates in the right direction; excited to see competitor responses https://x.com/zora/status/1917974164738125832?s=46
3 replies
4 recasts
20 reactions

Luciano  pfp
Luciano
@luciano
is “just for fun” a legal shield when it’s not actually just for fun?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Leo pfp
Leo
@leohenkels
Much better. Maybe they purposely made the token so bad originally, that any announcement following that provided some utility would be such a huge perceived upgrade.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
Agreed this is interesting
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction