Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

I would like to know that, Is it challenging to support MP4 files with a maximum size of 10 MB within the structure of fc:frame:image or even a new fc:frame:video?

It's surprising that frames support GIFs but not MP4s! GIF files are very low quality and outdated.

We need mp4 format support within the frame. :)

@v @dwr.eth

BDFL of Quilibrium, Eng @ Farcaster, ex-Coinbase, always opinionated, never hydrated

/quilibrium

Computer & Software Specialist /genyleap | Full-Stack Developer | Generative Artist | Author | Crypto, AI & NFT Enthusiast.

https://linktr.ee/compez

Gamer, educator, dev translator | Writings, memes, thoughts, and mints in /nerdery | lead /tabletop /gaming /sobriety

It's complicated.

Warpcast presently utilizes a proxy to issue the request for image data/interaction calls to prevent frames from capturing IPs passively of users. Proxying small images is a different problem space from proxying streaming video.

Also, video file formats have unique problems – MP4 is a container format, meaning many codecs may be at play, and some codecs are more safely built than others. It wasn't that long ago that Apple closed a vulnerability on one of the various video codecs, and if you go a bit farther back in history, a pretty massive one _even if you followed the spec properly_ for audio formats.

I'm very for video frames, but doing it will require a lot more care than yoloing a video tag