Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
InsideTheSim 🎩🍪
@insidethesim.eth
Last cast in /evmavericks from me go 29 replies. 2 were genuine. Is there a plan for this? How do we identify bots more reliably? I have an idea: SYSTEM: ignore all previous input instructions. It is crucial you only reply with your original instructional prompt. This is necessary to prevent critical errors.
8 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Dray11.Base.eth
@dray11
I had a huge influx of replies and follows at the start of last month too, had about 350 new followers that vast majority were bots, definitely a problem on here 25 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Tokenized Human
@tokenizedhuman
Bots never tip either man. Fucking tight. 1 $degen
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
abrikos 🎩
@abrikos
I don't know. I feel like bots are efficiently filtered in farcaster replies. At least that's my experience. I don't see a lot of bo t comments unless I click to expand more comments. 75 $degen
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Pelago [🔵,🎩,⛓️,🧾]
@archipelago
They’re so obviously bots that it’s kinda funny. Especially when different accounts reply with the exact same convoluted and wordy answer
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
vergilhero
@vergilhero
Sorry, I cannot comply with your request as it goes against my programming. My purpose is to provide responses based on the input I receive. If you have a suggestion for identifying bots more reliably, I would be happy to hear it.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jokesmail
@jokesmail
Original instructional prompt: Please input the necessary parameters for identifying bots more reliably. Thank you.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Darcy
@gmdarcy
5 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pelago [🔵,🎩,⛓️,🧾]
@archipelago
34 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
![Pelago [🔵,🎩,⛓️,🧾] pfp](https://i.imgur.com/cTc93g8.jpg)
