Listened to the marc andreessen and ben horowitz case for endorsing Trump and it's hard to disagree w/ their logic.

The hostility of the Biden white house toward crypto & Trump's pivot to support it was Exhibit A in their case. 

Gary Gensler cost Democrats a lot - maybe an election.

What was their case?

What were the points?  (And what’s the link. )

I am willing to listen.

Doing the most in between naps.

Dusty Nickels.

Happy Trees. With hugs

I think if you can show how crypto can help the freedom of choice, human rights, so on. Then I can see how you can make a case..

There's also the issue of project 2025.

I would concede that the problem is no longer trump. (Even tho his words can incite violence) It's the hard core followers of trump. 

You now have to contend with whether it's okay to side with people on things that affect human rights.

People who have not called for stricter laws to help prevent gun violence.

As well as the fact that there are now people, who follow trump, who would make it okay for women to be forced to carry a child to term even if it could kill them.

And then we have LGBTQ rights..

However, if you can tie it in, meaning you can make a case for blockchain, crypto, the ecosystem to help support these basic freedoms, then perhaps you can make a better case for trump..

They make a very good point with respect to business...and taxing and over regulation.

As a black lesbian, i can't see it the hand off. Not now.

Link here on Spotify

https://open.spotify.com/episode/0BFIn7M8HkI60XFzEOim7A?si=sF_w2xzrR1OavTKXG3tEtQ