I often see people Farcaster isn't "sufficiently decentralized".

You're free to define what "sufficiently decentralized" means to you, of course, but how we think about it is laid out in Varun's blog post.

I often see people Farcaster isn't "sufficiently decentralized".

You're free to define what "sufficiently decentralized" means to you, of course, but how we think about it is laid out in Varun's blog post.

https://www.varunsrinivasan.com/2022/01/11/sufficient-decentralization-for-social-networks

Im sorry but this is the most loose definition of decentralization, and essentially making twitter sufficiently decentralized...
you can always change the current setting because you control the protocol

kinda cant believe i fell for this shit tbh as if they actually were concerned with decentralization in a proper sense at all…. kinda hurts bro

In my definition the protocol would be an open source project that is managed by several small groups (and not one main group). not just the client ability to read the protocol.

since warpcast is almost exclusively the used client, and all sign ups are done via warpcast, its not decentrlized becuase if you're blocked or nerfed on wc, you're essentially blocked on the network.

Hope this makes sense