politics

So is the JD Vance couch joke illegal now? Or is it only materially deceptive if it's from one party?

So is the JD Vance couch joke illegal now? Or is it only materially deceptive if it's from one party?

https://x.com/GavinNewsom/status/1836188721663873324

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

Uh, couch jokes are a lot different from deepfakes

Sorry, just checked and didn't see that here. :)

I like pleasure spiked with blockchain and music is my aeroplane. It's my aeroplane. @pizzadao underboss & /politics contributor. Featured in "Number Go Up"

Sorry, just checked and didn't see that here. :)

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/

Yea, cause the founding fathers didn't know deepfakes were coming :)

That's why we have a Supreme Court. It's not for California to decide.

Worth reading about 6–3 United States v. Alvarez (falsity) or 8-0 Hustler Magazine v. Falwell (parody). In Alvarez, conservative justices voted against it!

That's why we have a Supreme Court. It's not for California to decide.

Worth reading about 6–3 United States v. Alvarez (falsity) or 8-0 Hustler Magazine v. Falwell (parody). In Alvarez, conservative justices voted against it!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Alvarez

Well then it'll get overturned in the Supreme Court if you're right. We can reapproach this idea when it gets there I guess.

If that's the case then constitutional scholars will be weighing in soon

I'm confident that it will. It's political posturing by Newsom.