Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/nouns
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Malbek
@malbek.eth
The PizzaDAO proposal hasn't been approved. I wonder, what are the reasons for this? For three years, we've maintained a relationship in which two of the largest creative DAOs in the ecosystem have come together to bring the spirit of Web3 to people and their communities. Thanks to these celebrations, Nouns has gained global recognition. We've accomplished great things in all world , and the core idea behind this collaboration aligns directly with the principles we aim to uphold with Nouns as a public good. However, I believe it's becoming increasingly difficult to democratize this space if we focus solely on managing these communities as if they were companies, governed by shareholders. What about the creators? What about the enthusiasts? What about those of us who dare to think big, just like the Nouns presentation video encourages us to do?
3 replies
8 recasts
22 reactions
Icetoad π π© π
@icetoad.eth
I'm not very familiar with the rules for passing proposals. It seems the 133 quorum was reached and a majority of the votes were in support, so what stopped this from being successful?
5 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Icetoad π π© π
@icetoad.eth
@nounishprof @toadyhawk.eth @snax.eth @yes2crypto.eth any of you know?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Nounish Prof ββ§-β§π©
@nounishprof
dynamic threshold β it needed 133 FOR votes to pass β every against vote raises the threshold
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
YES2Crypto π© πͺπ‘
@yes2crypto.eth
IT looks like the quorum (133) was not reached since it only got 106 "for" votes. Mousing over "quorum" defines it further.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Symbiotech.ββ¨-β¨π‘π©
@symbiotech
106 for and every no vote shifts the quorum requirement. 133 was the magic number. this is a real shame
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
113kw
@113kw
Now that's confusing π let's see during community call
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
