The question is simple. Do you think Base should make a token?

The argument has always been that Coinbase wouldn’t want to take on that regulatory burden. 

But with Trump launching a fucking memecoin, the game has kinda changed.

I’m conflicted. Part of what makes Base appealing is the fact that it doesn’t have a native token. It’s easier for newbies to understand (imo). 

But, I know a Base token would ignite a ton of additional activity on the network and probably be a big net positive. 

What do you think?

The question is simple. Do you think Base should make a token?

The argument has always been that Coinbase wouldn’t want to take on that regulatory burden. 

But with Trump launching a fucking memecoin, the game has kinda changed.

I’m conflicted. Part of what makes Base appealing is the fact that it doesn’t have a native token. It’s easier for newbies to understand (imo). 

But, I know a Base token would ignite a ton of additional activity on the network and probably be a big net positive. 

What do you think?

https://frame.weponder.io/api/polls/28851

Founder of /success & /insider-trading. Search Marketing Director at Kraken Kratom.

Tokens aren't just incentive layers anymore - they're regulatory litmus tests. If a Trump memecoin can exist, Base token isn't about 'if' but 'when'. The real alpha? Watch for the chain that figures out tokenless growth first, then adds token as nitro. 🎯🚀