Jeff Feiwell  pfp
Jeff Feiwell
@hyper
Here's the plan for PUBLIUS Proof of work off chain โ€” how do you prove things that aren't encoded in bits? The authors of the Federalist Papers needed to post anonymously while *proving* their bonafides. That's what Publius solves The utility of the token is to enable this
3 replies
8 recasts
43 reactions

Matthew ๐Ÿ”ต๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŒˆ ๐Ÿ”ฎ๐Ÿ– pfp
Matthew ๐Ÿ”ต๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŒˆ ๐Ÿ”ฎ๐Ÿ–
@mstublefield.eth
Am I understanding this correctly that I could prove that I created some off-chain work by explaining it well enough?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jeff Feiwell  pfp
Jeff Feiwell
@hyper
Thatโ€™s the idea!
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Matthew ๐Ÿ”ต๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŒˆ ๐Ÿ”ฎ๐Ÿ– pfp
Matthew ๐Ÿ”ต๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŒˆ ๐Ÿ”ฎ๐Ÿ–
@mstublefield.eth
But that makes no sense. I'm a big fan of Brandon Sanderson novels. With your approach, I could create an anon account, claim they're mine, answer your questions, and have that claim ratified as "truthy" when it's patently false. And using AI for testing claims? The claimant could use AI to pass your tests. From my perspective, this is a solved problem. Whether the creator/claimor is anon or not, they need to have a wallet that signs the original publication. Check out https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2024/01/09/fox-polygon-release-blockchain-powered-tool-verify-to-weed-out-deepfakes/ of filecoin or arweave, etc.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

MetaEnd๐ŸŽฉ pfp
MetaEnd๐ŸŽฉ
@metaend.eth
What if i use gpt to proof?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction