Unpopular opinion: Maybe tokenization isn’t the best model for RWAs. Key elements are immutable history in space and time, verifiable identity, privacy, and information read write controls for specific parties. Tokens good for some, not all.

I kind of agree with Anton's perspective https://antongolub.substack.com/p/tokenization-of-real-world-assets mostly for the liquidity part: supply of RWA ok, but I dont see the demand matching

It appears I'm not alone at least in the questioning if this is the right thing at the right time:

Neouroscience, ☯️, decentralization, AI. Building the next phase of onchain capital assets with  @ bldx.io

It appears I'm not alone at least in the questioning if this is the right thing at the right time: https://warpcast.com/rphgrc.eth/0xa71c7a7d

Founder alta.finance + pocketlistautos.com + Cavallo Rosso NFT // blue-chip automotive and real estate /rwa

We’ll see a lot of evolution here in the next few years.

100%. Oftentimes just having clear, open, and legally correct bridges between rwa <> on-chain is better

Software dev, stoic, father, Rocket League player, armchair philosopher. Working on digital twin / connected products / RWA solutions.

We'll be talking more about this in about 3 months, but I think we'll see the rather blunt instrument of "ownership" that NFTs adds a lot of complexity without a lot of value. We'll see a more nuanced approach, just as we are seeing a more nuanced approach on FC to user-ownership of nodes and edges.

Tell us more 🙏 what would your RWA tech cocktail be?

Why can’t tokens solve for those? When I think about what is more challenging to solve w tokens I see projects trying to bring unnecessary things onchain.