Passkey-based wallets are cool but I feel like people are skipping over the part where passkeys are scoped to domains, which means the provider could effectively brick your wallet at any time (I think, please tell me if I'm wrong)

Sounds like backup signers are in the roadmap but feels like an important caveat

I like baking /goodbread and building apps on web3 protocols. DevRel @ ENS Labs. gregskril.com

Ah I hadn’t thought about this deeply when I was creating it.  This makes sense. Why not host these things on IPFS/Arweave? 

Is it not that simple?

you probably don’t think about liquidity enough // it is what it is  // build value, not valuation

| 🎩  |  ↑  |  ⌐◨-◨

Passkeys are bound to a domain as part of the webauthn spec, it's a security feature.