Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ryan
@ryanchern
General thoughts on anon crypto founders?
6 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Henry
@hlau
Mixed. On the one hand there’s founders who won’t get a second look because they don’t have the right creds. On the other, there’s outright criminals who’ve never paid for their crimes. We shouldn’t be enabling them. I’ll settle for an anon founder w/ a ZK proof of non-scammy behavior.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Henry
@hlau
Also, my understanding is that most funded anons are doxxed to their sugar daddies, or VCs. Is that not the case?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ryan
@ryanchern
True, though they are still anon to the broader crypto community
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry
@hlau
I guess a better question might be how comfortable VCs are with funding known criminals/scammers and it seems they are more comfortable than they should be.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
