Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/politics
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jared 🎩
@javabu.eth
What's your thoughts on this proposal? I think I would have voted yes. "Last year, about a quarter of all health insurance claims were denied in California — a reality mirrored nationwide that has stoked public anger toward health care companies, and led to accusations that such decisions lack human empathy. But this month, a new state law is taking on the latest twist in the debate, ensuring that a human’s perspective cannot literally be removed from such decisions by prohibiting coverage denials be made on the sole basis of artificial intelligence algorithms." https://www.mercurynews.com/2025/01/05/new-california-law-ban-artificial-intelligence-deny-insurance-claims/
4 replies
3 recasts
5 reactions
highplains.base.eth 🎩✨🔴
@highplains66
I agree 100%. AI should not be trusted with any big public decisions for a (long) while. Analysis yes.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
rathermercurial
@rathermercurial.eth
All this focus on AI decision-making just serves to distract the populace from AI's highest-leverage civic use case: Autonomous execution of human-made (esp. collective) decisions. Using AI avatars with programmatic, autonomous executive authority can give the people the power to make rulers obsolete. This is the use case the ruling class wants to distract people from by catastrophizing and enforcing a vision of the future where AI is the decision-maker, not the bureaucrat.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
highplains.base.eth 🎩✨🔴
@highplains66
66 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
