Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Edric šŸŽ© pfp
Edric šŸŽ©
@edricnguyen.eth
šŸ‘‹ Hey friends! I'm thinking about good place to roll out. While exploring Farcaster, I've noticed minimal spam and mostly engaging content. šŸ˜… Which platforms need fact-checking for misleading ā€“ Reddit, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, or elsewhere? Thanks for the help šŸ™Œ, Iā€™m eager to hear your thoughts!
3 replies
3 recasts
4 reactions

erica pfp
erica
@heavygweit
all of them except reddit lol reddit users tend to fact check each other by writing essays with full sources, usually with personal insults at the end if neither budges the other ones are bigger echo chambers bc of character limits or og nature of the platform not being geared towards lengthy conversation or debate
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Edric šŸŽ© pfp
Edric šŸŽ©
@edricnguyen.eth
Thanks, Erica! Your last share provided valuable insights. Regarding Facebook, it's filled with spam but lacks X's news engagement where users mainly interact with friends' content As for X, I'm still figuring out a strong approach How about other platforms like political news aggregators, crypto sites, or Dextools?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction