Henry de Valence pfp

Henry de Valence

@hdevalence

21 Following
384 Followers
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
You will need a Penumbra wallet to claim (we built a private chain from the ground up!), there are currently two options: - pcli, command line - prax wallet, chrome extension Instructions on each can be found on https://guide.penumbra.zone pcli is probably easier / less invasive for devs, prax is more fun to use
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
Crossposting to farcaster: If you’re a Github contributor to any of Penumbra’s Rust dependencies, or to other notable crypto repos, you may be eligible for the Penumbra airdrop. Repo list: https://api.penumbra.claims/list/um-eligible-gh-repos.csv Claim info: https://penumbra.claims/info
1 reply
2 recasts
7 reactions
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
when you’re making transactions you mean? this could be that we just upgraded to the final versions of the proof statements, may not have propagated into the extension
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
nice. let me know if the faucet isn’t working, we keep running into discord api limits
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
https://guide.penumbra.zone :)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
that sounds like a fun conversation (on or off the chopping block)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
oh is that what the cover story was
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
like he said, a long and fascinating history, and you can repeat six times without it getting repetitive
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
haven’t posted on farcaster much since signing up about a year ago. aside from being busy i think what’s stopped me is that every time i opened the app, i mostly saw posts on fc about building stuff for fc but this can be an amazing foundation for a protocol
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
7x4’ LED bars at (claimed) 5000lm each mounted on shelves close to the ceiling, plus another 3500lm in GU10 spotlights in a ceiling fixture https://a.co/d/i7w3gwh
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
our seattle apartment has 40k lm supplemental daylight in the living room and it’s great
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
yeah, it is a difficult design problem to be sure, but it seems worth aiming for if possible. i want to spend more time understanding the current design before making a concrete suggestion
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
(blanket disclaimer that, like, it’s your protocol, not mine, so feel free to discount my bystander opinions to whatever extent you want)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
i don’t agree, i think this is only true without an end-to-end conception of the protocol design that excludes the devices people actually use from consideration… thereby forcing users to rely on hubs and making censorship easier in the long run
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
(thinking along these lines) farcaster://casts/0x7f624ace1853904201bf1fc1c15d4f646e5c172caaf2c1169af5df24ea75a6b7/0x0622ade7d6095abb2dcd56b9c73b75d1214a7228653b446f509bc1d04cc70065
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
is it possible to build a farcaster hub that only maintains a subset of the network state? if so, is it possible to avoid having a distinction between “clients” and “hubs”?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
also, in OMR, is the clue key tied to the detection parameters at all? can the false positive rate be controlled independently of the clue keys?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
hmm, can an attacker do anything by interfering with the address/clue key resolution? would it make sense to have something like a merklized transparency log of the clue keys? or, if the clue keys are subordinate to the address, can they be signed by the address and verified that way?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
neat, what’s the basic shape of the integration? are clues going to be bundled into transactions, or just posted to a separate scanning layer? how does the address <> clue key lookup work?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry de Valence pfp
Henry de Valence
@hdevalence
… so you have to build a way to synchronize a filtered version of the state on every client, so the clients local copy has only the subset that they actually care about
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction