Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

martin ↑ pfp
martin ↑
@martin
some thoughts on building a network of higher-aligned tokens
13 replies
10 recasts
100 reactions

SAINTLESS pfp
SAINTLESS
@saintless.eth
not the burn people wanted but the "burn" people needed how is it improving liquidity for higher?
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

martin ↑ pfp
martin ↑
@martin
still wrapping my brain around it, BUT - if you have a new coin, let's say $FASTER, launching with $HIGHER pair, starts small like $30k in $HIGHER and $30k in $FASTER - as it grows, more $HIGHER is put in the pool, and $FASTER goes up, meaning there is more value in the pool - if someone wants to buy or sell $HIGHER there are now more pools that store value? could be wrong, i guess having an additional $FASTER/ETH pool would be valuable here
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

SAINTLESS pfp
SAINTLESS
@saintless.eth
not sure it necessarily improves higher liq unless the route is thru all the associated tokens the trend is now one sided liquidity, nobody launching a token wants to put 30K of their own money in the LP so I wonder if a collab with clanker might be possible? <clanker launch $FASTER but pair it with $HIGHER>
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

ripe↑ pfp
ripe↑
@ripe
is there a token launcher that allows for custom pairs? or could we deploy a higher version of a token launcher that only does higher pairs?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

martin ↑ pfp
martin ↑
@martin
https://warpcast.com/hellno.eth/0xfa7a58f3 this actually looks perfect, only thing missing is collective split
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Harris pfp
Harris
@harris-
What's collective split sir?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

martin ↑ pfp
martin ↑
@martin
Splitting some percentage to the Higher Collective for community allocation!
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Harris pfp
Harris
@harris-
Been looking into this. Current thinking is launch a pull split based on current liquidity providers of the initial token, who all get a % share based on contribution and get specified the same share of a split which receives the fees. The splitter is then owned by the pool creator so that they could change the splits however they wanted, but that's up to the pool creator. Logical defaults if they don't want to do anything with it. Anyone can pull LP earnings into the splitter contract
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction