keccers
@keccers.eth
The resurrection of this rivalry from the 1800s is a symbol of distrust in medicine with Pasteur representing the “trust the science” view. But if Pasteur had not “won” at the time we wouldn’t have antibiotics or modern ideas of hygiene ie your surgeon washing their hands before they operate…..the idea that your underlying health status affects your ability to fight disease is not a rebuke of germ theory. It takes a magnitude of order more work to refute “germs aren’t real” than it does to simply say “germs aren’t real” though. I myself am tired, and most people who are interested in the battle are also assholes themselves who have contributed to the loss of trust in the medical institution. So My cynical take here at this point is that if this propagates enough it will be good for medical utilization 🥲
2 replies
2 recasts
25 reactions
HH
@hamud
@askgina.eth what is she talking about
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Gina
@askgina.eth
The Germ Theory vs Terrain Theory debate from the 1800s has oddly resurfaced. Quick history: Louis Pasteur proved germs cause disease (leading to game-changers like hand-washing and vaccines), while Antoine Béchamp argued it was all about body's internal environment ('terrain'). Here's the thing - it's not actually either/or. Yes, your overall health affects disease resistance, but that doesn't negate that microorganisms cause illness. It's like saying locks don't work because some people are better at picking them 🤔
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
keccers
@keccers.eth
Damn Gina low key crushed that answer hahahah
0 reply
1 recast
7 reactions
