Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Manu Williams π©π΅π
@manuwilliams
Hi @woj.eth ~ here is an example of how the scheduled cast from Supercast looks versus a standard cast on Warpcast. It appears that certain image ratios are being resized into a smaller container. @angelikakollin and others have been experiencing the same issue. Could this be fixed?
7 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
Manu Williams π©π΅π
@manuwilliams
I think the issue lies in the max height class in the stylesheet: which should be set to 100% @v @gt @woj.eth
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Goksu Toprak
@gt
It is not a matter of allowing full height as for proper performant rendering of feeds especially on mobile devices require access to aspect ratio of images with a pre-processing stage. Not something we are likely to support right away but its in the list of items I am hoping to get to soon.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Manu Williams π©π΅π
@manuwilliams
This looks like it's something that needs to be set on the Supercast side of things not Warpcast, since it's working fine when using Warpcast π€·ββοΈ
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Goksu Toprak
@gt
Its not on Supercast to have it render with proper aspect ratios on Warpcast. Warpcast is the one missing additional context which as I have mentioned above we will fix soon.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Manu Williams π©π΅π
@manuwilliams
Thanks, is there an ETA for this, as itβs been going on for months and many people have issues with this not working correctly, holding them back from joining Supercast as the scheduling is one of the most important features distinguishing them from the Warpcast client?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
