Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Manu Williams 🎩🔵💎
@manuwilliams
Hi @woj.eth ~ here is an example of how the scheduled cast from Supercast looks versus a standard cast on Warpcast. It appears that certain image ratios are being resized into a smaller container. @angelikakollin and others have been experiencing the same issue. Could this be fixed?
7 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
Manu Williams 🎩🔵💎
@manuwilliams
I think the issue lies in the max height class in the stylesheet: which should be set to 100% @v @gt @woj.eth
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Goksu Toprak
@gt
It is not a matter of allowing full height as for proper performant rendering of feeds especially on mobile devices require access to aspect ratio of images with a pre-processing stage. Not something we are likely to support right away but its in the list of items I am hoping to get to soon.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Manu Williams 🎩🔵💎
@manuwilliams
This looks like it's something that needs to be set on the Supercast side of things not Warpcast, since it's working fine when using Warpcast 🤷♀️
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Manu Williams 🎩🔵💎
@manuwilliams
This doesn't explain however why in this main cast for example images casted via Warpcast client display properly as this flower image - versus being restricted in height using the Supercast client. As you can see the max height set when checking on mobile is set to max height 2000px for example. Why is this not the case when using the Supercast client?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
