Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Max Jackson pfp
Max Jackson
@mxjxn.eth
Big news for /cryptoart! 🔻 @automod is on for the /cryptoart channel. To show up on main, you must hold a token from the /cryptoart DAO OE contract. Mint any DAO OE to gain visibility and participate in future /cryptoart DAO activities! 👇 https://zora.co/collect/base:0xce4f649d4ef8fee2e6628184892a54d226308b89/2
23 replies
19 recasts
73 reactions
eirrann | he/him🎩🔵 pfp
eirrann | he/him🎩🔵
@eirrann.eth
Hard to call a fees-only mint censorship, happy to mint one if it helps keep the bots at bay
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Max Jackson pfp
Max Jackson
@mxjxn.eth
yeah I agree. It feels controversial even though it probably isnt
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
GREENCROSS.xcp 🎩 pfp
GREENCROSS.xcp 🎩
@greencross.eth
Well to me it’s gatekeeping. Not the mint to main, I think that’s a great idea, but the fact that it will be in a handful of people the decision to decide who gets to be seen and downvoted. That’s not very DAO to me. I already get no reactions from my posts on this channel, so for me it might be the last goodbye
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
eirrann | he/him🎩🔵 pfp
eirrann | he/him🎩🔵
@eirrann.eth
Channels are inherently gatekept spaces, created/hosted by a person or group of people for a specific purpose
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Max Jackson pfp
Max Jackson
@mxjxn.eth
Its also just silly to call it gatekeeping. The main feed was already "censored" based on the warpcast algorithm. We're just "censoring" it based on a token plus a little curation. Recent feed remains uncensored.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
GREENCROSS.xcp 🎩 pfp
GREENCROSS.xcp 🎩
@greencross.eth
yes I understand that, I call it gatekeeping because it will depend on a handful of people who gets to be on the main feed and who doesn’t get downvoted. In the end it always ends up being the friends of the council and those who had any beef with any of them can forget any kind of recognition.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Max Jackson pfp
Max Jackson
@mxjxn.eth
i disagree. there are only a few council members and we all are anti-censorship. I recognize the risk as we grow but we have a small council right now. When we expand we will continue to revisit the rules to ensure fair play.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
GREENCROSS.xcp 🎩 pfp
GREENCROSS.xcp 🎩
@greencross.eth
I agree to disagree. I’m glad you’re working towards the betterment of the channel and cryptoart in general. I hope I get proved wrong in what I stated before.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Max Jackson pfp
Max Jackson
@mxjxn.eth
1000 $degen thank you for the discussion. I'm keeping in mind we might want to raise the downvote threshold to ensure its not abused.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
GREENCROSS.xcp 🎩 pfp
GREENCROSS.xcp 🎩
@greencross.eth
thanks so much for the tip and for being open to discussing :) Yeah that sounds like a great idea, at least a threshold of 4 to reach downvote consensus I’d say… but may be too high due to the amount of council members
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Max Jackson pfp
Max Jackson
@mxjxn.eth
yeah the council are largely not chronically online. Currently 3 seems like a reasonable upper threshold. Down to raising it in the future
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction